Research on the Long-Tail Profit Mechanism of Niche Brands in the Live-streaming E-Commerce Scenario
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jse.202511608
Author(s)
Lu Xinyu
Affiliation(s)
School of Business Administration, Beijing Normal-Hong Kong Baptist University, Zhuhai, Guangdong, China
Abstract
This study investigates the survival challenges of niche brands in the live-streaming e-commerce environment, focusing on the impact of the platform's commission rate (α) and traffic exploration rate (θ) on brand sustainability. We construct a two-stage Stackelberg game model with the platform as the leader and the brand as the follower, incorporating streamer effort (e) and exploration rate (θ) in the demand function using a constant-elasticity demand specification. The model derives the brand's optimal pricing and promotion strategies, considering platform constraints on break-even (no-loss) outcomes. Our findings show that greater exploration increases brand profits but with diminishing returns; platform profit follows an inverted-U shape with respect to exploration, achieving an optimal interior point; higher commission rates raise the exploration required for break-even; and streamer effort significantly complements exploration, reducing the required threshold for brand viability. These results provide a quantitative basis and operational guidelines for platform governance involving the coordination of commission rates, exploration efforts, and streamer incentives.
Keywords
Live-Streaming E-Commerce, Niche Brands; Long-Tail Theory; Stackelberg Game Model; Commission Rate; Traffic Exploration Rate; Streamer Effort; Break-Even Frontier; Platform Governance; Profit Mechanism
References
[1] Ai Rui Consulting. (2024). 2024 China e-commerce market research report.
[2] China E-commerce Research Center. (2024). 2024 survival status report on live-commerce brands.
[3] Anderson, C. (2006). The long tail: Why the future of business is selling less of more. Hyperion.
[4] Beida Zongheng Consulting. (2025, August). Current situation, dilemma and breakthrough path of the live e-commerce industry.
[5] Cao, X., Yuan, J., Wen, H., & Zhang, C. (2023). The pricing strategies under the online platform selling mode with information sharing. Kybernetes. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-01-2023-0051
[6] Chen, N., & Yang, Y. (2023). The Role of Influencers in Live Streaming E-Commerce: Influencer Trust, Attachment, and Consumer Purchase Intention. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 18(3), 1601-1618. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer18030081
[7] Elberse, A. (2008). Should you invest in the long tail? Harvard Business Review, 86(7/8), 88–96.
[8] Fleder, D. M., & Hosanagar, K. (2009). Blockbuster culture’s next rise or fall: The impact of recommender systems on sales diversity. Management Science, 55(5), 697–712.
[9] Ming, J., Jianqiu, Z., Bilal, M., Akram, U., & Fan, M. (2021). How social presence influences impulse buying behavior in live streaming commerce? The role of S-O-R theory. International Journal of Web Information Systems, 17(4), 300–320. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWIS-02-2021-0012
[10] NetSun E-commerce Research Center. (2024, November). 2024 “Double-11” live-commerce data report.