Palmprint Identification: Status and Strategies Analysis
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jsse.202408203
Author(s)
Mengna Yu1, Peng Li1*, Danxiao Gu2, Yan Shi3
Affiliation(s)
1Hubei University of Police, Wuhan, Hubei, China
2Criminal Investigation Brigade of Danjiangkou Public Security Bureau, Danjiangkou, Hubei, China
3Lvliang Public Security Bureau, Lvliang, Shanxi, China
*Corresponding Author.
Abstract
Palm print identification is a crucial component of handprint identification and serves as a technical method for confirming personal identity in investigative case-solving and judicial litigation. Currently, in practical applications, issues such as the lack of scientific identification methods, absence of clear identification standards, poor stability of certain minutia, and insufficient attention from identification personnel have led to a situation where there is a scarcity of relevant theoretical guidance and practical achievements, slow research progress, questionable scientific validity, and low efficiency in practical applications. To address these issues, improvements should be made by focusing on identification features, scientific methods, and the personnel involved in identification, aiming to fill the gaps, rectify inadequacies, and enhance the application efficiency of palm print identification.
Keywords
Palm Print Identification; Strategies
References
[1] Zhang Hao, Chen Ya－nan, Yang Lu, et al. (2023) Palmprint ridge distance estimation based on attention mechanism and residual network. Computer Technology and Development, 33(07):61-67.
[2] Zhang Hao. (2023) Research on Feature Optimization Methods in Palmprint Recognition. Shandong Jianzhu University.
[3] Maceo A V. (2009) Qualitative assessment of skin deformation: A pilot study. Journal of Forensic Identification, 59 (4): 390-440.
[4] Ma Rongliang, Liu Huan, Wu Chunsheng. (2023)Preliminary Probing into Probability-rendering conclusion of fingerprint identification. Forensic Science and Technology, 48(01):1-9.
[5] Guo Chengmo, Gong Zongyou, Lu Zhonghang. (1997) Identification of a small number of partial fingerprint features. Forensic Science and Technology, (02):24-25.
[6] Zhong Xinwen, Zhang Zhongliang. (2014) Dactylography. Beijing: Press of People’s Public Security University of China.
[7] Guo zibing, Wu guobo. (2017) On the value of third level features in identification of incomplete fingerprints. Lgality Vision, 22:130.
[8] Hu Jiadong. (2015) Comparative research on the handprint identification in China and America. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 5: 74-78.
[9] Hu Weiping. (2012) Study on the criterion of fingerprints identification and the probability of fingerprint identification conclusion. Evidence Science, 20(04): 480-488.
[10] LI Kang, Luo Yaping. (2023) Development of the evaluation methods for fingerprint evidence: from experience to science. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, (04): 38-44.
