Data Governance Collaboration and Resilience Reference Architecture for Road Emergency Response

DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jsse.202508407

Author(s)

Haiyun Sun1, Xueyan Bo2,*, Dongdong Guo3

Affiliation(s)

1Party School of the CPC Shandong Provincial Committee (Shandong Academy of Governance), Jinan, Shandong, China 2Disaster Reduction Center of Shandong Province, Jinan, Shandong, China 3Shandong High-Speed Airport Logistics Development Co., Ltd., Jinan, Shandong, China *Corresponding Author

Abstract

In the context of massive traffic volumes, extreme weather conditions, and cross-domain coordination, road emergencies often exhibit characteristics of “rapid onset, wide propagation, and high susceptibility to misinformation.” Addressing these governance challenges, this study reconceptualizes holistic situational awareness-traditionally treated as a technological issue-into an integrated paradigm of governance, coordination, and resilience. To this end, it proposes a “Three-Layer–Two-Chain–Three-Flow” reference architecture for road emergency management. Methodologically, the study introduces templated implementations of the RACI matrix and DSC contract, specifying “who accesses which data fields, for what purpose, at what time, and with what traceability mechanisms.” It further establishes a multi-tiered release, public communication, and navigation alignment mechanism to ensure consistency across information sources, interfaces, and interpretations. Leveraging zero-trust principles with minimal authorization and degradation–fault tolerance–recovery mechanisms for low-connectivity environments, the framework translates technical capabilities into actionable organizational authorizations and position-specific SOPs. Additionally, version governance-featuring semantic versioning, grayscale release, and rollback control-safeguards the semantic stability and traceability of rule evolution. Rather than relying on contrastive empirical validation, the proposed technical pathway offers an implementable, auditable, and transferable institutional model for provincial and municipal road networks and multi-agency emergency coordination, contributing to the development of resilient, adaptive, and accountable road governance systems.

Keywords

Roadway Emergency Response; Data Governance; Resilience Governance

References

[1]Endsley M. R. Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems. Human Factors, 37, 1995(37):32-64. [2]Asante K., Owen R., Williamson G. Governance of New Product Development and Perceptions of Responsible Innovation in the Financial Sector: Insights from an Ethnographic Case Study. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 2014(1):9-30. [3]Rodrı´guez H., Fisher E., Schuurbiers D. Integrating Science and Society in European Framework Programmes: Trends in Project-level Solicitations. Research Policy, 2013(5):1126-1137. [4]Parker C F, Nohrstedt D, Baird J, et al. Collaborative Crisis Management: a Plausibility Probe of Core Assumptions. Policy and Society, 2020, 39(4): 510-529. [5]Ostrom E. A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 2009, 325(5939):419-422. [6]Chen J L, Wang Y N. Research on multi-governance of social responsibility of platform enterprises. Modern Management Science, 2021(7):74-82. [7]Qi Xiaoliang. Resilient Governance: The Logical Shift and Practical Path of Public Security Governance in Megacities. Urban Development Studies, 2025, 32(9):139-144. [8]LinXue. An Interpretative Discourse Analysis of Resilient City Policies in China in a Risk Governance Framework. JOURNAL OF SJTU (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2025, 33(182):33-48+63. [9]Endsley M.R. Design and Evaluation for Situation Awareness Enhancement. In: Proceedings of the human factors society annual meeting, SAGE Publications, Los Angeles, 1988, 32(2):97-101. [10]Rao R. R., Eisenberg J., Schmitt, T. (Eds)., Improving Disaster Management: The Role of IT in Mitigation, Preparedness, Response and Recovery. The National Academies Press. Washington, DC, 2007. [11]Schmidt K. The Problem with “Awareness”. Introductory Remarks on “Awareness in CSCW”, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW): The Journal of Collaborative Computing, 2002, 11(3-4):285-298. [12]Zhou Yi, Bai Xuerui. Research on Data Collaborative Governance Mechanisms Driven by Application Scenarios. Information Studies: Theory & Application, 2025, 48(11):49-56. [13]Hu Feng, Wang Bing, Zhang Siqian. From Boundary Division to Cross-boundary Conjugation: A Scan of Interaction Dilemmas and Relief Paths for Government Data col‐laborative Governance. E-Government, 2023(4):93-105. [14]Ye Zhanbei. Practical Promotion and Collaborative Logic of Government Data Governance: A Case Study of N City. Chinese Public Administration, 2021(6):44-49. [15]Brandell E. E., Strom D. J., Van deelen T. R, et al. A call to Action: Standardizing White-tailed Deer Harvest Data in the Midwestern United States and Implications for Quantitative Analysis and Disease Management. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 2022(10):943411. [16]Tang Yingfeng, Chen Shiping. Modeling and Solution for Load Balancing Optimization in Distributed Stream Processing System Management. Operations Research and Management Science, 2021, 30(4):155-162. [17]Zhou Xia, Gu Ying, Chen Weidong,et al.Research on Influencing Factors and Driving-dependence mechanisms of government data collaborative governance .Information Science, 2025,43(2):67-75+148. [18]Huang Yue, Li Dewei, Xu Enhua. Research on Smart Travel Service Data System for High-speed Railway Passengers. Railway Transport and Economy, 2024, 46(6):87-96.