Fire Risk Analysis and Prevention Measures for Old Residential Districts

DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jsse.202608106

Author(s)

Chang Li, Zini Wang*, Jianfeng Chen

Affiliation(s)

School of Civil Engineering, Shenyang Jianzhu University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China *Corresponding Author

Abstract

The accelerated pace of urbanization has increasingly exposed older residential communities to significant fire safety risks. This study develops a fire risk assessment framework for ORCs by analyzing typical fire incidents, conducting field investigations, and administering expert questionnaires. The framework comprises three core dimensions: fire hazard factors, prevention and control capabilities, and emergency response. An indicator system for evaluating ORC fire risk was established using factor analysis, and a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model was subsequently constructed and validated through a case study. Based on the identification of common critical factors—such as ubiquitous fire hazards, daily management proficiency, and emergency response capacity—targeted prevention and control measures are proposed. This research aims to provide a foundational basis for enhancing fire risk management in older residential neighborhoods.

Keywords

Older Residential Communities; Fire; Hazardous Factors; Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation; Prevention and Control Measures

References

[1]Wang, X., Zhang, C., & Sun, W. (2025). Common Safety Hazards and Regulation Strategies in the Renovation of Old Urban Residential Areas. Scientific Journal of Technology, 7(2), 74–83. [2]Garcia-Castillo, E., Paya-Zaforteza, I., & Hospitaler, A. (2023). Fire in heritage and historic buildings, a major challenge for the 21st century. Developments in the Built Environment, 13, 100102. [3]Li, X., & Qin, R. (2022). Performance-based firefighting in dense historic settlements: An exploration of a firefighting approach combining value and risk assessment with numerical simulation. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 11(6), 1134–1150. [4]Verma, I. (2024). Safety in Housing for Older Adults—A Qualitative Case Study. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 43(12), 1914–1923. [5]Ashour, M., & Mahdiyar, A. (2024). A comprehensive state-of-the-art survey on the recent modified and hybrid analytic hierarchy process approaches. Applied Soft Computing, 150, 111014. [6]Bose, A. (2023). Improving consistency classification: An innovative benchmark‐based approach for the AHP. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 31(1–2). [7]Wang, Y., Hou, L., Li, M., & Zheng, R. (2021). A Novel Fire Risk Assessment Approach for Large-Scale Commercial and High-Rise Buildings Based on Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) and Coupling Revision. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(13), 7187. [8]Smelkov, G. I., Pekhotikov, V. A., Ryabikov, A. I., & Nazarov, A. A. (2020). Updating of the National Normative Base in the Field of Ensuring Fire Safety of Electrical Wiring. Occupational Safety in Industry, 11, 29–36. [9]Zheng, X., Cai, G., Guo, J., Gao, W., Huang, Y., & Tong, X. (2023). Combustion characteristics and thermal decomposition mechanism of the flame-retardant cable in urban utility tunnel. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 44, 102887. [10]Bryant, S., Rickard, I., & Spearpoint, M. (2023). A Survey of Fire Loads on Private Residential Balconies in England. Fire Technology, 59(6), 3415–3443. [11]Meacham, B. J. (2023). Fire safety of existing residential buildings: Building regulatory system gaps and needs. Fire Safety Journal, 140, 103902. [12]Qin, R., Dai, X., Ding, C., Zhang, Z., Jiao, Y., & Ren, X. (2024). A Study on the Impact of Window Partition Walls on the Spread of Fire on Building Facades. Fire, 7(7), 253. [13]Ko, W. (2025). Study on Ways to Improve Satisfaction with Fire Safety Education. Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation, 25(1), 83–90. [14]Kwon, H., & Ko, W. (2021). A Study to Improve Recognition of Emergency Exits. Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation, 21(5), 131–138.