On the Legal Nature and Liability of Shared Employment
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jel.202614106
Author(s)
Weiyu Lu
Affiliation(s)
China Jiliang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Abstract
Against the background of the digital economy driving the diversified transformation of employment forms, this paper focuses on the identification of the legal nature and liability undertaking of shared employment. Combined with three practical models, it deeply differentiates the similarities and differences between shared employment and other employment forms such as labor dispatch, employee secondment and labor outsourcing, and clarifies its unique legal attributes. The paper focuses on sorting out the tripartite legal relationship structure of shared employment, and points out many problems caused by the lag of current legal norms, including the absence of definition of the legal nature of shared employment, inconsistent judicial adjudication standards, ambiguous identification of labor relations and disputes over liability undertaking. On this basis, this paper further explores the liability undertaking mechanism of shared employment, and proposes paths such as improving institutional design, strengthening administration supervision and consolidating corporate social responsibility to clarify the boundaries of rights and obligations of all parties. The research aims to regulate shared employment, protect the legitimate rights and interests of workers, promote the healthy and orderly development of the flexible employment market, and safeguard the unity and authority of the labor legal system.
Keywords
Shared Employment; Flexible Employment; Legal Nature; Liability Undertaking; Protection of Labor Rights and Interests
References
[1]Cui Can, Wang Ke. Legal Disputes, Focuses and Choices for the Protection of Labor Rights and Interests in Shared Employment. Journal of Beijing Vocational College of Labour and Social Security, 2024, 18(03):28-35.
[2]Lei Jieqi. Identification of Dual Labor Relations in Shared Employment. Journal of Shandong Normal University (Social Sciences Edition), 2025, 70(05):123-134. DOI:10.16456/j.cnki.1001-5973.2025.05.011.
[3]Tian Silu. Shared Employment: The Tripartite Contract Structure in "Narrowly Defined Secondment". Law Science, 2022(01):143-158.
[4]Zhu Yanqiu. Informality of Employment: Practical Defects and Regulatory Approaches of "Shared Employees". Human Resources Development of China, 2020, 37(12):70-80. DOI:10.16471/j.cnki.11-2822/c.2020.12.006.
[5]Qin Pingshan, Guo Hua. Dilemmas and Approaches for the Protection of Workers’ Rights and Interests under the Shared Employment Model. Journal of Hebei University of Economics and Business (Comprehensive Edition), 2025, 25(02):39-48. DOI:10.14178/j.cnki.issn1673-1573.2025.02.004.
[6]Cao Yanchun. Affirmative Theory on the Establishment of Dual Labor Relations by the Labor Contract Law. Journal of Political Science and Law, 2006(02):66-70.
[7]Zhao Hongmei, Jia Jie. Analysis on the Nature and Legal Relationship of Shared Employment and the Construction and Improvement of Legal System. Journal of China University of Labor Relations, 2021, 35(06):62-77.
[8]Mu Suixin. The Principle of Tilted Protection in China’s Labor Law: Identification, Connotation and Theoretical Basis. Academics, 2012(12):95-102+285.
[9]Lin Yanqin, Lin Zhenyu. Nature Identification and Legal Regulation of Shared Employment. China Labor, 2020(06):53-67. DOI:10.19390/j.cnki.chinalabor.2020.06.004.