STEMM Institute Press
Science, Technology, Engineering, Management and Medicine
Algorithmic Transparency and Consumer Trust: Ethical Reflection and Development Strategies of Personalized Recommendations in E-Commerce
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62517/jmsd.202612134
Author(s)
Lan Yao
Affiliation(s)
Department of Digital Business, Qingdao Huanghai University, Qingdao, China
Abstract
With the increasing penetration of artificial intelligence technologies, personalized recommendation systems have become a core instrument for e-commerce platforms to enhance user engagement and improve conversion rates. However, the consumer trust crisis induced by the “black box” nature of algorithms has grown increasingly prominent. Striking a balance between improving recommendation accuracy and ensuring algorithmic transparency while safeguarding consumer rights has thus emerged as a central concern for both academia and industry. This paper synthesizes existing literature on algorithmic transparency and, in response to the practical challenges currently faced—namely, lack of recommendation fairness, information cocoons, privacy violations, and ambiguous attribution of responsibility—proposes innovative strategies including hierarchical transparency design, user control empowerment, and institutional collaborative governance. The study aims to provide both theoretical support and practical guidance for the development of a trustworthy e-commerce ecosystem.
Keywords
Algorithmic Transparency; Consumer Trust; Personalized Recommendation; E-Commerce Ethics
References
[1] Shin D, Park Y J. Role of fairness, accountability, and transparency in algorithmic affordance. Computers in Human Behavior, 2019, 98(1): 277-284. [2] Yang C, Xiaoran LU. Correction: Educational pathways for enhancing algorithmic transparency: a discussion based on the phenomenological reduction method. AI&SOCIETY, 2026, 41(2):1625-1625. [3] Cohen G, Amarasingham R, Shah A, et al. The legal and ethical concerns that arise from using complex predictive analytics in health care. Health Affairs, 2014, 33(7): 1139-1147. [4] Zhang Mingyue. A Study on the Impact of Algorithmic Transparency on Consumer Trust and Transaction Efficiency in Platform Economy. Consumption and Brand Communication, 2025, (22): 5-8. [5] Li Guohao, Liang Yongtao, Su Jialu. Breaking the Governance Dilemma of Algorithmic Black Box in Digital Platform Enterprises: A Study Based on the Diffusion of Algorithmic Transparency Strategy. Journal of Information Resources Management, 2023, 13(02): 81-94. [6] Huang Y M, Liu L. The impact of algorithm awareness on the acceptance of personalized social media content recommendation based on the technology acceptance model. Acta Psychologica, 2025, 259: 105383. [7] Zhao Longxuan, Lin Cong. Youth in the "Black Box": College Students' Algorithmic Awareness, Algorithmic Attitudes and Algorithmic Manipulation. China Youth Study, 2022, (07): 20-30. [8] Hassan N, Abdelraouf M, El-Shihy D. The moderating role of personalized recommendations in the trust–satisfaction–loyalty relationship: an empirical study of AI-driven e-commerce. Future Business Journal, 2025, 11(1):1-15. [9] Sun B, Pei S, Wang Q, et al.Understanding the Impact of Algorithmic Discrimination on Unethical Consumer Behavior. Behavioral Sciences (2076-328X), 2025, 15(4). [10]Hayes J L, Britt B C, Evans W, et al. Can social media listening platforms’ artificial intelligence be trusted? examining the accuracy of crimson hexagon’s (now brandwatch consumer research’s) AI-driven analyses. Journal of Advertising, 2021, 50(1): 81-91.
Copyright @ 2020-2035 STEMM Institute Press All Rights Reserved